Friday, August 19, 2022

16 quotes

 



1. "The cause of most disease is in the poisonous drugs physicians superstitiously give in order to effect a cure." Charles E. Page, M.D.

2. "The greatest part of all chronic disease is created by the suppression of acute disease by drug poisoning." Henry Lindlahr, M.D.

3. "Every educated physician knows that most diseases are not appreciably helped by medicine." Richard C. Cabot, M.D. (Mass. Gen. Hospital)

4. "Medicines are of subordinate importance because of their very nature they can only work symptomatically." Hans Kusche, M.D.

5. "If all the medicine in the world were thrown into the sea, it would be bad for the fish and good for humanity" O.W. Holmes, (Prof. of Med. Harvard University)

6. "Drug medications consists in employing, as remedies for disease, those things which produce disease in well persons. Its materia medica is simply a lot of drugs or chemicals or dye-stuffs in a word poisons. All are incompatible with vital matter; all produce disease when brought in contact in any manner with the living; all are poisons." R.T. TraIl, M.D., in a two and one half hour lecture to members of congress and the medical profession, delivered at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C.

7. "Drugs never cure disease. They merely hush the voice of nature's protest, and pull down the danger signals she erects along the pathway of transgression. Any poison taken into the system has to be reckoned with later on even though it palliates present symptoms. Pain may disappear, but the patient is left in a worse condition, though unconscious of it at the time." Daniel. H. Kress, M.D.

8. "Every drug increases and complicates the patients condition." Robert Henderson, M.D.

9. "Medicine is only palliative, for back of disease lies the cause, and this cause no drug can reach." Wier Mitchel, M.D.

10. "The person who takes medicine must recover twice, once from the disease and once from the medicine." William Osler, M.D.

11. "Medical practice has neither philosophy nor common sense to recommend it. In sickness the body is already loaded with impurities. By taking drug - medicines more impurities are added, thereby the case is further embarrassed and harder to cure." Elmer Lee, M.D., Past Vice President, Academy of Medicine.

12. "Our figures show approximately four and one half million hospital admissions annually due to the adverse reactions to drugs. Further, the average hospital patient has as much as thirty percent chance, depending how long he is in, of doubling his stay due to adverse drug reactions." Milton Silverman, M.D. (Professor of Pharmacology, University of California)

13. "Why would a patient swallow a poison because he is ill, or take that which would make a well man sick." L.F. Kebler, M.D.

14. "What hope is there for medical science to ever become a true science when the entire structure of medical knowledge is built around the idea that there is an entity called disease which can be expelled when the right drug is found?" John H. Tilden, M.D.

15. "The necessity of teaching mankind not to take drugs and medicines, is a duty incumbent upon all who know their uncertainty and injurious effects; and the time is not far distant when the drug system will be abandoned." Charles Armbruster, M. D.

16. "We are prone to thinking of drug abuse in terms of the male population and illicit drugs such as heroin, cocaine, and marijuana. It may surprise you to learn that a greater problem exists with millions of women dependent on legal prescription drugs." Robert Mendelsohn, M.D


The Error of Germ Theory

HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


Spanish Flu

If there is no virus, why are people dying?


The bartender gave me the hangover disease again



The bartender gave me the hangover disease again

 


If you go out to the bar and you "overindulge" (drink more poison then your current tolerance level) you pay the price right? Either that night you spend praying to the porcelain god or the next morning you have a debilitating hang over.

If someone asks you what happened? Why are you vomiting, have diarrhea, are nauseous, have a headache, etc, what do you tell them?

Do you say I drank too much?

Or do you say the bartender sneezed and I caught microscopic beasties from him that invaded my body and gave me a hangover disease?

Silly right?

Of course you don't say that.

You know that ingesting poison has consequences and those consequences are called a hangover.

Yet every year from October to April (Halloween till Easter) humans gorge themselves on toxins and trigger detox events (food hangovers) called "colds" and "flus". Since we have been taught to fear our bodies cleaning themselves, we call these cleaning and healing events "getting sick" even though we are getting well from them.

Crazy right?

And even though we overindulged and gave ourselves a food "hangover" which requires cleaning symptoms to eliminate the toxins and excess waste from our system, we still believe, without a shred of evidence, that our cold and flu detox healing events are invasions by microscopic beasties causing “disease”.

And that belief is highly profitable for the disease for profit industry which heavily promotes this fear of our bodies healing themselves. Without this fear we cannot create epidemics of Cancer, Heart Disease, Obesity, etc which are a trillion dollar a year business...

-by Lauren Whiteman

The Error of Germ Theory

HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


Spanish Flu

If there is no virus, why are people dying?


16 Quotes



If there is no virus, why are people dying?

 



COVID: If there is no virus, why are people dying?


by Jon Rappoport
January 6, 2022

Yesterday, I published one of my articles explaining how the existence of SARS-CoV-2 was fabricated - when, actually, the virus doesn’t exist at all.

Naturally, people who haven’t been reading the 450 or so articles I’ve written about the pandemic fraud then ask, “So why are all these people getting sick and dying?”

Today, I’m republishing one of my articles that answers that question:

Since the beginning of this false pandemic, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.

Then people ask, “So why are all these people dying?”

I have explained that, many times, and in this article I’ll explain it again.

First of all, the whole notion that COVID-19 is one health condition is a lie. COVID IS NOT ONE THING.

This is both the hardest and simplest point to accept and understand.

Don’t reject the existence of the virus and then say, “So what is THE cause of people dying?” There is no ONE CAUSE. There is no one illness. There is no “it.”

By far, the biggest sources of illness we are dealing with are lung conditions: called pneumonia, flu, flu-like disease, TB, other unnamed lung/respiratory problems.

THESE ARE BEING RELABELED “COVID.” It’s a repackaging scheme. People are dying for those traditional reasons, and their deaths are being called “COVID.”

Thus, the old is artificially made new. It’s still old.

In this wide-ranging group of people who have traditional lung conditions, by far the largest population is the elderly and frail.

They are dying in nursing homes, in hospitals, in their houses and apartments. In addition to their lung problems, they have been suffering from a whole host of other conditions, for a long time, and they’ve been treated with toxic drugs for years.

They’re terrified that they might receive a diagnosis of “COVID,” and then they ARE given that diagnosis. THEN they’re isolated, cut off from friends and family. They give up and die.

This is forced premature death.

Some of these elderly and frail people are heavily sedated and put on breathing ventilators—which is a killing treatment. In a large New York study, it was discovered that “COVID” patients over the age of 64, who were put on ventilators, died 97.2 % of the time. Staggering.

Many of these elderly and frail people are put on antiviral drugs—e.g., remdesivir—which are highly toxic.

Some of these elderly and frail patients are now dying from reactions to the COVID vaccine—and of course, their deaths are listed as “COVID.”

Why else are people dying? In many cases, it’s a simple matter of bookkeeping. They die in hospitals for a variety of reasons, and staff write “COVID death” on their files. In the US, states receive federal money based on these statistics.

Let’s say that, in certain places around the world, there are clusters of deaths (being called COVID) that can’t be explained in the ways I’ve just described.

In those situations, you would have to examine EACH situation closely. For example, just prior to an outbreak in Northern Italy, was there a vaccination campaign? What was in the vaccine? A breed of toxic substances?

You have to consider each cluster independently.

Getting the picture?

None of the “COVID deaths” anywhere in the world requires the existence of a new virus.

For instance, in Wuhan, where the whole business began, the first “COVID” cases of pneumonia occurred in a city whose air is HEAVILY polluted. In China, every year, roughly 300,000 people die from pneumonia. That means millions of cases. None of those deaths need to be explained by invoking a new virus.

Now, add to all this the fact that the PCR test for the (non-existent) virus is rigged so it spits out positive results like a fire hose. Thus, the high case numbers.

The “pandemic” is invented.

The fraud is promoted.

During these fake epidemics (there have been many), someone will say: “But my neighbor’s son, who was very healthy, died suddenly. It must be the virus.”

No. People who appear to be healthy do die. Not just today, but going back in history as far as you want to go. No one has an explanation. They might have an explanation if they looked very closely, but they don’t look closely.

Favoring the “virus explanation” is a bias, a knee-jerk reaction, a response to propaganda.

If you think there must be other major reasons to explain “why all these people are dying,” keep in mind that “lung conditions” is a category that expands all over the globe. For instance, there are about one BILLION cases of flu-like illness EVERY YEAR on planet Earth.

Repackaging/relabeling just a small percentage of those cases alone would account for all official COVID death numbers.

What’s new about COVID is the COVID STORY. That’s what’s being sold: a STORY about a COVID virus.

I’m aware that authors have been presenting other reasons for people who have been getting sick and dying since early 2020. I’m not necessarily rejecting those reasons. But if some of them are true, they only represent part of the picture. Again, it’s not one thing that’s killing people.

There is a programmed impulse to say, “If it isn’t X, then it must be Y. If X isn’t the cause of people dying, then Y must be the cause.” That’s the basic lie. It’s the basic lie of all so-called pandemics.

It’s also a con. At the highest levels of planning, propagandists (inventers of reality) know that people are willing to buy one explanation for one phenomenon.

But “COVID” isn’t one phenomenon. There is no “it.”

And there is no single cause.

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/06/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying-why/


The Error of Germ Theory

HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


Spanish Flu

The bartender gave me the hangover disease again


16 Quotes



Friday, August 12, 2022

Spanish Flu

 

SPANISH FLU

This 'disease' did not spread outwards in all directions like a contagious disease is supposed to, it popped up almost simultaneously in several army barracks amongst soldiers. Coincidentally in preparation for WW1, a massive military vaccination experiment involving numerous prior developed vaccines took place in Fort Riley, Kansas- where the first “Spanish Flu” case was reported.

One of the startling things they said about the disease was how it seemed to knock the young and fit the hardest. Like soldiers? And that it would be fast, like one day fit and healthy the next day dead. Sort of like as if they’d been poisoned!!

The fledgling pharmaceutical industry, sponsored by the ‘Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research’, had something they never had before – a large supply of human test subjects. Supplied by the U.S. military’s first draft, the test pool of subjects ballooned to over 6 million men.

From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley. They had around SIX MILLION soldiers to experiment on.

WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14 – 25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once.

They decided to reclassify this as a new disease (Spanish Flu) How did all the people at home start dying when the soldiers came home if it wasn’t contagious? Answer- Well they didn’t want them to catch it so they vaccinated them too.

An American called Eleanor McBean who’s parents were doctors at the time wrote that “only the vaccinated died”. Her unvaccinated parents caught nothing from the sick people they treated.

Another culprit seems to be the newly invented wonderdrug ASPIRIN. People were given doses as high as 400 times the lethal dose we use today as soon as they showed symptoms.

There was of course hysteria going on in the UK surrounding the news of deaths from a new contagious disease plus soldiers already suffering post traumatic stress were committing suicide and even murder in their madness, even this madness was blamed on the flu, not the war.

“Autopsies after the war proved that the 1918 flu was NOT a “FLU” at all. It was caused by random dosages of an experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’, which to this day, mimics flu-like symptoms.

The massive, multiple assaults with additional vaccines on the unprepared systems of soldiers and civilians created a “killing field”.

Those that were not vaccinated were not affected.” So yet again it seems vaccines and drugs were the cause of this ‘plague’ maybe add in a splash of injury and stress too from the war.

https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2020/12/29/the-spanish-flu-a-blueprint-for-2020


The Error of Germ Theory

HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


If there is no virus, why are people dying?


The bartender gave me the hangover disease again


16 Quotes

 

The Myth of Contagion

 

The aforementioned study was published in 1919, and its purpose was to determine influenza’s mode of spread. It was carried out on a group of 100 volunteers from the U.S. Navy and took place on an island in Boston Harbor called Gallops Island.

"According to a document from The American Association of Immunologists, at the time these experiments were conducted, many scientists believed that influenza was caused by what was then known as Pfeiffer’s bacillus. This is because during the influenza pandemic of 1892, a German doctor named Richard Pfeiffer isolated these bacteria from influenza patients.

That being said, the first thing they did in the experiments at Gallops Island was administer a “rather moderate amount” of “a pure culture of bacillus of influenza, Pfeiffer’s bacillus” into the nostrils of some of the volunteers.

Nothing happened, so they decided to administer “a very large quantity of a mixture of thirteen different strains of the Pfeiffer bacillus” to 19 of the volunteers by spraying it into their nose, eyes, and throat while they inhaled. Still, none of them got sick.

Next, they “collected the material and mucous secretions of the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi” from influenza patients in Boston hospitals and administered this to ten of the volunteers.

This study took place during the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, so there was certainly no shortage of influenza patients at the time.

Basically, they allowed these people, who were sick with influenza, to cough and blow their noses into a tray after gargling and/or washing out the nostrils with a sterile salt solution, and mucous was also swabbed from their throats and nostrils. This mixture was then sprayed into the nostrils, eyes, and throats of the volunteers, and it was also instilled (dispensed with an eye dropper) into some of the volunteers. However, even after all this, no one got sick.

At this point, the doctors running the experiments suspected that perhaps the reason nobody got sick was that these secretions had to travel up to four hours to get from Boston hospitals to the test subjects on Gallops Island, and “the virus was perhaps very frail, and could not stand this exposure”.

So, they tried the experiment again, but this time they had the material rushed to Gallops Island in only an hour and forty minutes. Also, they administered six times as much material to each subject as they did in the previous experiment, but still, none of them fell ill.

Next, they suspected that “it is possible that the salt solution might be inimical to the virus”, so in an attempt to eliminate “all other outside influences”, they “transferred the material directly from nose to nose and from throat to throat” using cotton swabs on the end of sticks. It’s not clear whether they brought patients to Gallops Island or had the Navy volunteers visit the hospital(s), but in any case, they made sure to try this with patients who were on their first day of the disease, as well as with those on their second and third days. Again, none of the volunteers came down with anything.

In the next experiment, blood was taken from the arms of influenza patients and then injected into ten volunteers, but even this couldn’t get anyone sick.

Then the doctors “collected a lot of mucous material from the upper respiratory tract” and ran it through filters which block normal sized bacteria and only allow “ultramicroscopic” organisms to pass through. They injected this filtrate into ten volunteers, and, you guessed it, nobody got sick.

Next, they wanted to simulate the way that influenza is supposed to spread naturally.

They brought ten volunteers to the U. S. Naval Hospital at Chelsea, where there was a ward filled with influenza patients. Here, the volunteers were made to be in close contact with these patients, shaking their hands, sitting by their bedsides and talking with them, and then, while “muzzle to muzzle” the patients breathed out as hard as they could while the volunteers breathed in. This was done five times.

They even went so far as to have the patients cough directly into the volunteers’ faces. This was also done five times.

Each volunteer went through this whole process with ten different influenza patients at various stages of the disease. But incredibly, even after all this, the volunteers were watched carefully for a whole week, and surprise, surprise, none of them got sick.

In addition, it also points out that two of the doctors who worked on the experiments conducted a similar study at Goat Island, San Francisco, and “they were unable to reproduce the disease” in these tests, as well.

https://alexanderlambert.wordpress.com/tag/contagion-experiments/

https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/02/22/contagion-a-fairy-story

https://zenodo.org/record/1505669#.YRUd1fKSnIV

 

The Error of Germ Theory

HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

Spanish Flu

If there is no virus, why are people dying?


The bartender gave me the hangover disease again


16 Quotes

 

Polio

 

 

“Without question the go-to disease to defend vaccines is polio. Coincidently it's also the greatest lie and medical con job of all time. Toxins Causing "Polio" is well documented. Polio is the virus that never was.

1824: Metal workers had suffered for centuries from a paralysis similar to polio caused by the lead and arsenic in the metals they were working with. English scientist John Cooke observed: 'The fumes from these metals, or the receptance of them in solution into the stomach, often causes paralysis.'

1890: Lead arsenate pesticide started to be sprayed in the US up to 12 times every summer to kill codling moth on apple crops.

1892: Polio outbreaks began to occur in Vermont, an apple growing region. In his report the Government Inspector Dr. Charles Caverly noted that parents reported that some children fell ill after eating fruit. He stated that 'infantile paralysis usually occurred in families with more than one child, and as no efforts were made at isolation it was very certain it was non-contagious' (with only one child in the family having been struck).

1907: Calcium arsenate comes into use primarily on cotton crops.

1908: In a Massachusetts town with three cotton mills and apple orchards, 69 children suddenly fell ill with infantile paralysis.

1909: The UK bans apple imports from the States because of heavy lead arsenate residues.

1921: Franklin D. Roosevelt develops polio after swimming in Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick. Toxicity of water may have been due to pollution run-off.

1943: DDT is introduced, a neurotoxic pesticide. Over the next several years it comes into widespread use in American households. For example, wall paper impregnated with DDT was placed in children's bedrooms.

1943: A polio epidemic in the UK town of Broadstairs, Kent is linked to a local dairy where cows were washed down with DDT.

1944: Albert Sabin reports that a major cause of sickness and death of American troops based in the Philippines was poliomyelitis. US military camps there were sprayed daily with DDT to kill mosquitoes. Neighboring Philippine settlements were not affected.

1944: NIH reports that DDT damages the same anterior horn cells that are damaged in infantile paralysis.

1946: Gebhaedt shows polio seasonality correlates with fruit harvest.

1949: Endocrinologist Dr Morton Biskind, a practitioner and medical researcher, found that DDT causes 'lesions in the spinal cord similar to human polio.'

1950: US Public Health Industrial Hygiene Medical Director, J.G. Townsend, notes the similarity between parathion poisoning and polio and believes that some polio might be caused by eating fruits or vegetables with parathion residues.

1951: Dr. Biskind treats his polio patients as poisoning victims, removing toxins from food and environment, especially DDT contaminated milk and butter. Dr. Biskind writes: 'Although young animals are more susceptible to the effects of DDT than adults, so far as the available literature is concerned, it does not appear that the effects of such concentrations on infants and children have even been considered.'

1949-1951: Other doctors report they are having success treating polio with anti toxins used to treat poisoning, dimercaprol and ascorbic acid. Example: Dr. F. R. Klenner reported: 'In the poliomyelitis epidemic in North Carolina in 1948 60 cases of this disease came under our care... The treatment was massive doses of vitamin C every two to four hours. Children up to four years received vitamin C injection intramuscularly... All patients were clinically well after 72 hours.'

1950: Dr. Biskind presents evidence to the US Congress that pesticides were the major cause of polio epidemics. He is joined by Dr. Ralph Scobey who reported he found clear evidence of poisoning when analyzing chemical traces in the blood of polio victims.
Comment: This was a no no. The viral causation theory was not something to be questioned. The careers of prominent virologists and health authorities were threatened. Biskind and Scobey's ideas were subjected to ridicule.

1953: Clothes are moth-proofed by washing them in EQ-53, a formula containing DDT.

1953: Dr. Biskind writes: 'It was known by 1945 that DDT was stored in the body fat of mammals and appears in their milk... yet far from admitting a causal relationship between DDT and polio that is so obvious, which in any other field of biology would be instantly accepted, virtually the entire apparatus of communication, lay and scientific alike, has been devoted to denying, concealing, suppressing, distorting and attempts to convert into its opposite this overwhelming evidence. Libel, slander, and economic boycott have not been overlooked in this campaign.'

1954: Legislation recognizing the dangers of persistent pesticides is enacted, and a phase out of DDT in the US accelerates along with a shift of sales of DDT to third world countries.
(Note that DDT is phased out at the same time as widespread polio vaccinations begin. Saying that, polio cases sky rocket only in communities that accept the polio vaccine, as the polio vaccine is laced with heavy metals and other toxins, so the paralysis narrative starts all over again. As the polio vaccines cause huge spikes in polio, the misinformed public demand more polio vaccine and the cycle spirals skyward exponentially)

1956: the American Medical Association mandated that all licensed medical doctors could no longer classify polio as polio. All polio diagnosis would be rejected in favor of Guillian-Barre Syndrome, AFP (acute flaccid paralysis), Bell's Palsy, Cerebral Palsy, ALS, (Lou-Gehrig's Disease), MS, MD etc etc. This sleight of hand was fabricated with the sole intent of giving the public the impression that the polio vaccine was successful at decreasing polio or eradicating polio. The public bought this hook, line and sinker and to this very day, many pro vaccine arguments are ignited by the manufactured lie regarding the polio vaccine eradicating polio.

1962: Rachel Carson's Silent Spring is published.

1968: DDT registration cancelled for the US.

2008: Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) is still a raging in many parts of the world where pesticide use is high, and DDT is still used. AFP. MS, MD, Bell's Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Guillian-Barre are all catch basket diagnosis, all similar in symtpoms, tied to heavy metal poisoning and high toxic load.

Conclusion: Modern belief that polio is caused by a virus is an ongoing tragedy for the children of the world. Public funds are wasted on useless and dangerous vaccines when the children could be treated with antitoxins. A call into failing vaccine mythology is warranted, as is a complete investigation of the real agenda being executed against humanity involving science, chemicals, vaccines, the medical field in general, and the government.”

https://vaccineharm.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/marco-polio/

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2008/11/25/fear_of_the_invisible_the_virus_that_never_was.htm



Measles

 

 

German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David Bardens attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in a medical journal. At that time, a Judge in the regional court in Ravensburg, South Germany, ruled in the favour of Dr. Bardens in a controversial decision claiming the criteria for evidence had been met.

The First Civil Senate of the BGH confirmed a judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) on in February 2016. The sum of 100,000 euros which was offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus did have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to bear all procedural costs.

Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.

In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world's largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently. The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.

MORE INFO:

All About That Measles Trial by Tracey Northern

HIV/AIDS

 

 

A CALL FOR THE TRUTH
A White Paper On The Viral-AIDS Hypothesis
By Robert Willner

The history of medicine contains a plethora of instances in which physicians have acted tragically under "consensus of opinion" rather than relying on substantial scientific evidence. This practice has its origins in the long-held concept that medicine is an "art" rather than a science. In recent decades, the major advances in technology have allowed us to emerge from the "dark ages" of diagnostic and therapeutic doctrines that were often based on personal prejudice and "medical politics". Unfortunately, we have also fallen victim to fraudulent scientific papers because of the inherent trust we place in our colleagues engaged in arcane areas of medical research. In the early 1980’s, physicians became aware of what appeared to be an emerging epidemic which is now known throughout the world as AIDS. Along with all of my colleagues, I eagerly followed the releases from the "authorities" about the progress of the disease and the involved explanations related to behavior of the new retrovirus which was given the designation HIV. In spite of my relative ignorance about retroviruses, I became suspicious that something was awry when retrovirologists, who had spent twenty years and in excess of twenty billion dollars in research on viruses, became involved in extensive apologetics with reference to HIV. They began to use terms such as "mysterious" and "intelligent" in the ever growing number of additional hypothetical explanations needed in the attempt to clear up the contradictions arising with reference to the original virus -- AIDS HYPOTHESIS. I underscore the word hypothesis to remind my colleagues that the so-called AIDS virus has never been proven scientifically to cause any disease, let along AIDS. Every scientific pronouncement is without laboratory proof and is mere supposition.

Allow me to be presumptive enough to speak on behalf of some of our most respected colleagues in the area of research on AIDS; Dr. Peter Duesberg, Professor Molecular Biology, University of California at Berkeley, the world’s foremost retrovirologist; Dr. Charles A. Thomas, Professor of Microbiology, Harvard; Dr. Kary Mullis, six-time Nobel Candidate, Nobel Laureate, 1993 and discoverer of the Polymer Chain Reaction. These are just a few of the hundreds of prominent scientists who have banded together to form "The Group For The Reevaluation Of The AIDS Hypothesis". I have spent five years in researching as many scientific papers and lay periodicals as possible in order to try to fully understand the enigma of the phenomena called AIDS. Everything I have read and verified has confirmed the suspicions which grew out of the obvious contradictions of the "hypothesis" and the practical experience from treating AIDS victims. AIDS is not an enigma, our medical texts have clearly defined the causes of acquired immune deficiencies for over fifty years. What appeared to be an emerging epidemic amongst homosexuals, occurred as a result of three coincidental phenomena; the advent of the "drug culture" of the sixties, the use of amyl nitrite ("poppers") and the visibility of the "gays" as a group when they "came out of the closet". If we add two other obvious factors, starvation in Africa (long recognized as the major cause of immune deficiency) and the use of AZT, the enigma of AIDS becomes crystal clear. The "mysterious" and the "intelligent" virus suddenly becomes the uneventful, ordinary, inanimate piece of dead tissue that it is.

http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/rwcall.htm

Dr. Robert Willner; 1994, had over 40 years of experience and was an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax.

In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself. 

In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain's most popular television show envoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the "AIDS hypothesis." When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: "I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind."

He tested negative multiple times. 

He died of a heart attack 4 months later on the 15th of April in 1995

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQCKb1JV-4A

Kary Mullis - American biochemist, chemistry Nobel laureate, and inventor of PCR tests – was also questioning the AIDS/HIV narrative.

Watch this video for Kary Mullis discussing the absolute lack of any scientific data available:
https://www.facebook.com/126822242919970/videos/233416971991529

When asked about Anthony Fauci, Kary Mullis stated:
"Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, and he doesn’t know anything really about anything. Nothing…He should not be in a position like he’s in…You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to and a smugly like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people, face out, and lie directly into the camera."
Kary Mullis died suddenly in August 2019.


The Error of Germ Theory

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


Spanish Flu

If there is no virus, why are people dying?


The bartender gave me the hangover disease again


16 Quotes




Debunking Germ Theory

 

In the history of virology there's never been a truly isolated virus. This is important because Germ Theory of viral transmission only benefits Big Pharma and demonstrates many logical flaws when held up to true scientific principles. 

What is generally meant by isolation - which has never been done - is to take a sample from an 'infected' patient and directly view and isolate the so-called 'virus' under such technology as an electron microscope. Bacteria are scientifically provable, and this can be done. This cannot be done with so-called 'viruses'. All known 'viruses' are computer-simulated gibberish. 

If you read page 43 of their own document (FDA website) you will see that they openly admit to having taken a simulation out of stock and there was no *Covid* samples available for comparison.
page 43 (page 43 in most browsers - found under 'Performance Characteristics')
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA...”

That is merely fancy language for multiplication of computer-simulated strands that prove no existence of anything.

We then use inappropriate ‘testing’ methods such as PCR and claim it demonstrates the ‘virus’, conveniently ignoring that a PCR test set on a high cycle could show everyone has Ebola and many other so-called ‘viruses’ too.

Pellagra was labeled a contagious disease until they found out it was a nutritional deficiency. Typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, and other ‘infectious diseases’ disappeared when people were provided clean water and sanitation. Polio was/is associated with DDT/other toxins. Toxins and poisons and deficiencies are more frequently the cause of what people call viruses...which aligns more scientifically with Terrain Model. 

Most people’s ‘opinion’ is that viruses are identifiable vectors for us to potentially catch a contagious illness. But that is simply not true. The reality is - in any true measurable data performed under actual scientific principles of Koch’s postulates – no one has never successfully isolated a ‘virus’. So-called ‘viruses’ are merely computer simulated mental constructs.

Please watch this video “Viruses are Mental Constructs” from Dr. Stefan Lanka
https://www.facebook.com/126822242919970/videos/509198550145867

They take a sample, and they spin it and then they add certain culture mediums and grow something, then they amplify it, filling in the gaps and creating the sequences with computer technology. Then they call it a 'virus'. 

‘Viruses’ as we know them are able to be patented. However, no ‘product of nature’ patents are allowed. You cannot patent a naturally occurring bacteria as they are a ‘product of nature’. So why can you patent a ‘virus’? The answer is they are man-made and not ‘naturally occurring’ e.g. computer simulations.
https://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/13381/can-you-patent-an-existing-bacteria-without-any-modifications

And again (same as posted above) this video from Dr. Lanka explains this process:
“Viruses are Mental Constructs”
https://www.facebook.com/126822242919970/videos/509198550145867

Many medical people have a difficult time even considering the error of Germ Theory because they think they have seen these phenomenon for their own eyes...but in most cases they should just look a little closer. For example: Urinary Tract Infections have run rampant through facilities in what seems like 'outbreaks' but we would not consider UTIs an 'infectious' disease. So why do even non-'viral' symptoms often appear in clusters? 

We must be willing to consider that everything we think to be true might not be true at all if we want to create a truly healthy and educated society.

In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687

In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951

In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/

In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions.
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/34/4/400/832936?redirectedFrom=fulltextA

In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing. “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold. That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/

In 1937 Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/

In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1940.tb79929.x

https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/02/22/contagion-a-fairy-story/


So a common question – “If there is no such thing as a infectious virus, then why did diseases decline and/or vaccines eradicate these diseases?”

There is plenty of evidence available to answer this question. Vaccines never eradicated anything. An unbiased review of the evidence demonstrates vaccines have never been demonstrated to work at all – unless harming people and making a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies is the definition of 'working'.. 

Disease declined because of improvement in the human TERRAIN.

“The 19th-century population shift from country to city that accompanied industrialization and immigration led to overcrowding in newly populated cities that lacked proper sanitation or clean water systems. These conditions resulted in repeated outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, TB, typhoid fever, influenza, yellow fever, and malaria. By 1900, however, the incidence of many of these diseases had begun to decline because of public health improvements, implementation of which continued into the 20th century.

Sanitation & Hygiene

Local, state, and federal efforts to improve sanitation and hygiene reinforced the concept of collective ‘public health’ action (e.g. to prevent infection by providing clean drinking water). By 1900, 40 of the 45 states had established health departments. The first county health departments were established in 1908.

From the 1930s through the 1950s, state and local health departments made substantial progress in disease prevention activities, including sewage disposal, water treatment, food safety, organized solid waste disposal, and public education about hygienic practices (e.g. food handling and handwashing).”

https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases/


"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health...In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc., were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water." Dr Andrew Weil, Health and Healing

Around 1900-1930, scientists weren’t at all decided on which theory was correct. Germ theory took root after Rockefeller funded germ theory advocate Louis Pasteur “won” the discussion by presenting fraudulent proof of infection against terrain theory advocate Antoine Béchamps.
Another nail in the terrain theory coffin was the Rockefeller funded Carnegie Flexner report which weaponized politics in favor of centralized, drug-based medicine against natural medicine. It was a hostile takeover.
Why would somebody want this falsehood sustained?
Because fear for organisms invading your body sells drugs and vaccines. Viruses also provide a cover explanation when people get sick from environmental toxicity or to perpetrate a pandemic power grab for totalitarian control.
https://wickedtruths.org/en/viruses-do-not-exist

Another video with Dr. Stefan Lanka and some of the experiments he is doing:
The Final Refutation of Virology:
https://yummy.doctor/video-list/the-final-refutal-of-virology-the-scientific-revolution-is-here-english-version

Germ Theory is simply untrue. What we call disease can consistently be shown to originate from a source of poison, toxin, deficiency, or trauma - such as toxic water, inappropriate/not nutritionally desirable food choices, the administration of dangerous pharmaceuticals, etc. When examining individual 'disease' conditions the underlying causes become increasingly obvious.

Contagion and infectious 'germs' has never been demonstrated despite many years of trying. We are being repeatedly poisoned and nutritionally boycotted - and sometimes unknowingly poisoning ourselves - and it is all based on a long history of utter deception and fabrication.

Break the cycle.



If you have a Telegram account you can watch many interesting videos here:
https://t.me/OpposedtoVaccines


Book recommendations:


HIV/AIDS

Polio

Measles

The Myth of Contagion


Spanish Flu

If there is no virus, why are people dying?


The bartender gave me the hangover disease again


16 Quotes